Corporation Law for Global Environmental Governance- myassignmenthelp

Question: Discuss about theCorporation Law for Global Environmental Governance. Answer: Abstract Most companies have been practicing some form of corporate social and environmental responsibility with the common objective of contributing significantly towards the well-being of the society as it the society upon which the companies not only depends but also impact either positively or negatively. With the growing pressure to cloth Corporate Social responsibility (CSR) as one of the business disciplines and the growing demand that every business initiative should have a positive outcome is way too much to expect from Corporate Social Responsibilities. It further distracts the organizations from its primary objective, which is to bring the social and environmental responsibilities of the companies into line with the purpose and values of the organizations. The CSR programs initiated by the business organizations enables business to attract clients/customers enhance reputation of the company and improve employee morale. However, the CEOs and the board must possess adequate knowledge about the advantages and restrictions of the CSR programs, while selecting an initiative that is beneficial for both the company and the community. This research aims at outlining the potential of CSR in evaluating the impact of CSR responsibilities of business organizations on the society. The research provides a clear outline of the features of the CSR and to what extent fulfilling the corporate social responsibilities aids a company to become a good corporate citizenship. It further explores the factors that may act as a hindrance for a company to become a good corporate citizenship. Corporate Citizenship: An Overview The term corporate citizenship is related the fact that companies not only considers the impact it has on the economy but also considers the impact it has on the environment and the society. Corporate citizenships refer to the responsibilities that a business organization assumes beyond the scope of the commercial relationship that it carries out in its day-to-day activities. The concept of corporate citizenship encompasses both, an economic necessity as well as moral responsibilities (Tai Chuang, 2014). Corporate citizenship or commonly known as corporate social responsibility is the persisting business commitment made by the business organizations to make significant contribution to the economic development and behave ethically with a view to improve the quality of workforce, local community and the society as a whole. Potential impediments faced by companies in becoming a good corporate citizenship CSR purports to bring about sustainability in the corporate culture and the business activities carried on by the business organization in three ways, namely, social, economic and environmental sustainability. It is imperative for the business organization to concentrate equally on the three dimensions to ensure compliance with the corporate social responsibilities. However, there are certain factors or rather potential impediments that tend to prevent the company from becoming a good corporate citizenship. On one hand, some of the business organizations consider CSR to be an exterior part of their business and on the other hand, some of the organizations regard the corporate social responsibilities to be an irrelevant issue for the business (Clapp Rowlands, 2014). They consider that the main objective of the organizations is confined to customer satisfaction only and gives it more priority to economic sustainability than to social and environmental sustainability. It is often observed that focusing merely on customer satisfaction results in ignorance towards the other important changes that could affect the business unexpectedly. Despite the universally accepted principle of practicing shared value, which aims at developing economic value in a manner that also, creates societal values, most of the companies practice a complicated form of CSR (Muller, 2014). This cope of the multifaceted form of CSR extends from philanthropy to the environmental sustainability and then to the attainment of shared value. Further, one of the issues that impede the company from becoming a good corporate citizenship is that most of the successful companies are seemed to give less importance in incorporating CSR within their business strategies and objectives; instead, they prefer to devise a strong CSR program that is in alignment with the purpose and values of the business organization. However, despite the fact that several companies clinch to the extensive perception of the corporate social responsibility, they are often subjected to certain significant hindrances that affects the implementation of the corporate social responsibilities carried out by the organization. Apart from the issue that some of the companies perceives customer satisfaction as its primary objective, thus ignoring social an environmental sustainability, the other significant factors include absence of rational connections with the various CSR programs and lack of effective coordination (Crane Matten, 2016). Further, despite the efforts made to involve the CEOs of the organization in the CSR programs, it has been observed that the CSR programs are usually conducted and managed by the various internal managers in an inappropriate and uncoordinated manner. The participation or involvement of the CEOs in carrying out the CSR programs is seldom noticed. In the recent decades, there has been a gradual increase in the expectations of the public with respect to business organizations. While the investors require the firms to maintain a profit-making objective but the public has become aware of the significant impact that business organizations have on the society and its environment. As mentioned earlier that the CEOs of the business organizations hardly demonstrate any interest in participating in carrying out the corporate social responsibilities or managing the CSR related programs, it is imperative for such companies to initiate training programs for the managers who eventually conducts or manages such programs. Lack of coordination may enhance complicacies relating to the conduct of social responsibilities. Since various internal managers conduct the CSR programs they may have, contradictory goals and the way of conducting the programs may also differ. Consequently, the inappropriate coordination may ultimately have an adverse imp act upon the society and the environment as a whole (Mackey, 2014). Further, the second issue hindering the companys potential to become a good corporate citizenship is that the CEOs of the company are not interested in contributing in carrying out the CSR of the organizations; instead, they rely on various internal managers to perform the responsibilities (Hur, Kim Woo, 2014). One of the significant consequences of such omission on part of the CEOs is the outcome of conducting the CSR programs in an inappropriate way. The reason behind such inappropriate conduct is twofold: firstly, the managers are often nit adequately trained; secondly, they consider their respective ways to be the appropriate way as their superiors are less interested in checking whether the company is performing its CSR effectively. Conclusion Although the companies have adopted CSRs programs and policies but their lack of willingness and determination about maintaining the three dimension, that is, social, economic and environmental sustainability in alignment with the purpose and values of the company, often lead to an adverse impact upon the society and the environment as a whole. Therefore, in order to overcome these impediments and improve the performance of the organization in carrying out its corporate social responsibilities, the companies must develop consistent and rational CSR strategies. This initiative should be the taken by every Board member and the CEOs of the organization who seldom take part in carrying out the corporate social responsibilities of the organization. Some of the CSR activities of an organization are not designed with a view to enhance business developments directly and produce immediate profits. For instance, the activities may include donations, involvement with community initiatives etc. The CSR programs must be designed in a manner, which aims at delivering environmental and social benefits in certain manner that aids the company in operating across the value chain, thus, improving the effectiveness and efficiency of the organization. Reference List Alnder, M. S., Curbach, J. (2014). The corporation as citoyen? Towards a new understanding of corporate citizenship.Journal of Business Ethics,120(4), 541-554. Clapp, J., Rowlands, I. H. (2014). Corporate social responsibility.The Essential Guide to Global Environmental Governance. Routledge: London, 42-44. Crane, A., Matten, D. (2016).Business ethics: Managing corporate citizenship and sustainability in the age of globalization. Oxford University Press. Hur, W. M., Kim, H., Woo, J. (2014). How CSR leads to corporate brand equity: Mediating mechanisms of corporate brand credibility and reputation.Journal of Business Ethics,125(1), 75-86. Korschun, D., Bhattacharya, C. B., Swain, S. D. (2014). Corporate social responsibility, customer orientation, and the job performance of frontline employees.Journal of Marketing,78(3), 20-37. Mackey, S. (2014). Virtue ethics, CSR and corporate citizenship.Journal of Communication Management,18(2), 131-145. Muller, A. (2014). Corporate social responsibility.Wiley Encyclopedia of Management. Salib, J., Sun, D., Wu, J., Wen, X., Huang, C. C. (2015). Corporate Social Responsibility. Suliman, A. M., Al-Khatib, H. T., Thomas, S. E. (2016). Corporate Social Responsibility.Corporate Social Performance: Reflecting on the Past and Investing in the Future, 15. Tai, F. M., Chuang, S. H. (2014). Corporate social responsibility.Ibusiness,6(03), 117.